November 30, 2010

12 Angry Men

The Top 63 Marathon, part 57 (#7)



Data
Title: 12 Angry Men
Year: 1957
Length: 96 minutes
Director: Sidney Lumet
Writer: Reginald Rose
Starring: Henry Fonda, Martin Balsam, John Fiedler, Lee J. Cobb, E.G. Marshall, Jack Klugman, Edward Binns, Jack Warden, Joseph Sweeney, Ed Begley, George Voskovec, Robert Webber
Music: Kenyon Hopkins
Distinctions: Oscar nominations for Best Picture, Best Director and Best Adapted Screenplay; currently #8 on the IMDb's Top 250

My reaction
Synopsis: jurors deliberate on a murder trial with mandatory death penalty
How I saw it: on video (rented from Netflix), yesterday
Concept: Great.
Story: Great.
Characters: Great.
Dialog: Great.
Pacing: Great. Nothing but a bunch of guys talking to each other, and you're on the edge of your seat.
Cinematography: Great.
Special effects/design: Good.
Acting: Great.
Music: Indifferent. It's good music, but every time it cuts in (which is not often) is an unwelcome intrusion.
Subjective Rating: 8/10 (Great) 9/10 (One of my favorites). I say "nothing but a bunch of guys talking to each other," but honestly, I can't think of anything I'd rather see in a movie than really gripping conversation. I don't know if it's hard to pull off, or if it's just hard to sell, but it's a shame there aren't more movies like this.
Objective Rating: 3.7/4 3.8/4 (Great).

[edit: re-watched 10/5/2012]

November 29, 2010

Peter Pan

Data
Title: Peter Pan
Year: 1953
Length: 77 minutes
Directors: Clyde Geronimi, Wilfred Jackson & Hamilton Luske
Writers: Ted Sears, Erdman Penner, Bill Peet, Winston Hibler, Joe Rinaldi, Milt Banta, Ralph Wright & William Cottrell, based on the play by J.M. Barrie
Starring: Bobby Driscoll, Kathryn Beaumont, Hans Conried, Bill Thompson
Music: Oliver Wallace (score); Sammy Fain, Sammy Cahn, Oliver Wallace, Erdman Penner, Frank Churchill, Ted Sears & Winston Hibler (songs)

My reaction
Synopsis: three children follow Peter Pan to Neverland
How I saw it: on video a couple times, most recently yesterday (have on VHS)
Concept: Great. A Disney movie based on one of the best books ever written. What could go wrong?
Story: Bad. How did they manage to twist Peter Pan into a story about how all women are petty, jealous bitches? (And how completely awful must Song of the South be if they keep that hidden away and let this one out?)
Characters: Bad.
Dialog: Good.
Pacing: Indifferent.
Cinematography: Indifferent.
Special effects/design: Good. Great design, mediocre animation.
Acting: Good.
Music: Bad. Great score, terrible songs.
Subjective Rating: 6/10 (Okay). Disposable cartoon antics interspersed with tedious singing. Bonus point for letting Captain Hook shoot one of the tedious singers.
Objective Rating: 2.2/4 (Okay).

November 25, 2010

Doctor Who #79: Revenge of the Cybermen



Data
Title: Doctor Who“Revenge of the Cybermen”
Year: 1975
Network: BBC
Episodes: 4, at 25 minutes each; the last story (of five) from season twelve
Creators: Sydney Newman, C.E. Webber, Donald Wilson
Director: Michael E. Briant
Writer: Gerry Davis
Starring: Tom Baker, Elisabeth Sladen, Ian Marter
Music: Ron Grainer (theme); Carey Blyton

My reaction
Synopsis: a conspiracy involves a space outpost, an inhabited moon of Jupiter, and an approaching Cyberman ship
How I saw it: on video (rented from Netflix), yesterday
Concept: Indifferent.
Story: Indifferent. Nice plot ideas, poorly executed.
Characters: Indifferent.
Dialog: Indifferent. A lot is bad, but Baker gets a few fun lines.
Pacing: Indifferent.
Cinematography: Indifferent.
Special effects/design: Good. Obviously rubber masks, but nicely designed as obvious rubber masks go.  Great sets and locations.
Acting: Indifferent.
Music: Indifferent.  I actually liked a lot of it, but it's not performed well and the mix is terrible.
Subjective Rating: 6/10 (Okay). It's fine. Apart from a few plot holes, there's nothing terribly wrong with it, apart from the lack of anything terribly right with it. Just not engaging.
Objective Rating: 2.1/4 (Okay).

November 23, 2010

Doctor Who: Series Five



Data
Title: Doctor Who: The Complete Fifth Series
Year: 2010
Network: BBC
Episodes: 13, at 45-65 minutes each
Creators: Sydney Newman, C.E. Webber, Donald Wilson
Directors: Adam Smith (3 episodes), Andrew Gunn (2), Jonny Campbell (2), Catherine Morshead (2), Ashley Way (2), Toby Haynes (2)
Writers: Steven Moffat (6 episodes), Chris Chibnall (2), Mark Gatiss (1), Toby Whithouse (1), Simon Nye (1), Richard Curtis (1), Gareth Roberts (1); with characters by Terry Nation
Starring: Matt Smith, Karen Gillan
Music: Ron Grainer (theme), Murray Gold



My reaction
Synopsis: a mysterious alien travels through space and time with a human girl
How I saw it: online as it aired (Spring 2010); on video over the past week or two (have on DVD)
Concept: Great.
Story: Good. Most episodes are great. Three of them are kind of bad, and the attempt at a season-long story arc is annoying.
Characters: Great.
Dialog: Great.
Pacing: Great.
Cinematography: Indifferent.
Special effects/design: Good. Good design, but the special effects have regressed a few years.
Acting: Good. Smith hasn't got anything on David Tennant's acting chops. Don't get me wrong, though, he's perfect casting for The Doctor. Really great acting is inevitably going to humanize the character. Tennant's performances could move you to tears, but that took the character in a very un-Doctorly direction. This time around, they leave the tear-jerking responsibilities to great directing, writing and guest stars, and let the Doctor be an alien.
Music: Indifferent. I'm getting the feeling that Murray Gold has done what he can do with this show, and they're over-due to bring in somebody new. What he did in the first series was absolutely brilliant, and he's had some fun re-imagining things over the years, but he's kind of failed to adapt to the "new" show. He gets some points for attempting something new, but loses them immediately for putting the Who Wants to Be a Millionaire music in my head.
Subjective Rating: 10/10 (Favorite of my favorites). They had a great opportunity to re-invent the series, to make Steven Moffat's Doctor Who as different from Russel T. Davies' Doctor Who as Davies' was different from the classic show. I mean, they've got a completely new cast, new producers and a new head writer. I could be wrong, but I'm pretty sure there wasn't ever such a complete, simultaneous change-over in key Doctor Who personnel throughout the classic show's entire history. But at the same time, I don't think a change in Doctor Who personnel has ever had less impact on the feel of the show. I mean, apart from the new Doctor*, the occasional nod and wink to William Hartnell, and the lack of obligatory gay characters, nothing's really changed. It's still as great as it ever was, and the quality of individual episodes might be a bit higher than before, on average (but it's hard to say - the Silurian story brings it down quite a bit). Perhaps, with the ridiculous success of the show, they felt obligated to carry on with the old formula. But the beauty of Doctor Who is that it changes; not just The Doctor, but the entire show. So where's my new era?
Objective Rating: 3.3/4 3.4/4 (Very good).



*This is my first proper New Doctor (when I started watching the show, Tennant had already done a series (and by the time I caught up with everything (or, at least, everything on region 1 DVD), he'd done two series)) which is a big deal so I should comment. So far I like Smith's take on The Doctor. Whatever that take is. Who is the eleventh Doctor? As I noted above, he's alien - probably more alien than even the fourth Doctor was - but what are his other defining characteristics? Doctor Four was alien and witty; Doctor Eleven is alien and... what? Fumbling? Reckless? Goofy? Can you even tell from a single series?

I've noticed that whenever The Doctor regenerates, his new personality overcompensates for his previous personality's major flaws. For instance, the second Doctor was terrified of everything, in place of the first Doctor's reckless curiosity. So I'd like to think that, in place of the tenth Doctor's near-crippling loneliness and tendency to fall in love with humans, the eleventh Doctor is someone who can completely forget that the people around him are there. He's the Doctor who leaves Amy waiting for 14 years while he breaks in the TARDIS, who runs off without ever looking to see if you're following, who lets people get attacked while his back is turned, and who tells a blinded companion surrounded by evil aliens to wait there while he goes to save the day because she would only slow him down. Then again, I could be completely wrong, and he could be the goofy weirdo who eats fish custard, wants to wear a fez, and dances badly at weddings.

November 22, 2010

One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest

The Top 63 Marathon, part 56 (#8)



Data
Title: One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest
Year: 1975
Length: 133 minutes
Director: Milos Forman
Writers: Lawrence Hauben & Bo Goldman; play by Dale Wasserman; based on the novel by Ken Kesey
Starring: Jack Nicholson, Louise Fletcher, William Redfield, Brad Dourif, Will Sampson
Music: Jack Nitzsche (and non-original music)
Distinctions: Oscars for Best Picture, Best Director, Best Adapted Screenplay, Best Actor (Nicholson) and Best Actress (Fletcher); Oscar nominations for Best Supporting Actor (Dourif), Best Cinematography, Best Score and Best Editing; currently #9 on the IMDb's Top 250



My reaction
Synopsis: an apparently sane convict is transferred to a mental hospital
How I saw it: on video many times, most recently yesterday (rented from Netflix)
Concept: Great.
Story: Good.
Characters: Good.
Dialog: Great.
Pacing: Great.
Cinematography: Indifferent.
Special effects/design: Great.
Acting: Great.
Music: Indifferent. Kind of a schizophrenic soundtrack (no pun intended).
Subjective Rating: 8/10 (Great). One of my biggest movie pet-peeves is the Nurse Ratched character: the unrelatable villain who exists for the sole purpose of committing gross injustices against innocent characters, thereby uniting the easily manipulated members of the audience with the protagonist in their common hatred of something absurdly easy to hate - the Nazi Commanders or the Wicked Step Mothers of the fictional world. It's really a testament to how great this movie is that even though it's the quintessential example of that type of character device, it still works, and I don't roll my eyes even a little.
Objective Rating: 3.4/4 (Very good).

November 18, 2010

The Empire Strikes Back

The Top 63 Marathon, part 55 (#9)



Data
Title: Star Wars: Episode V - The Empire Strikes Back
Year: 1980
Length: 124 minutes [original version]
Director: Irvin Kershner
Writers: Leigh Brackett & Lawrence Kasdan; story by George Lucas
Starring: Mark Hamill, Harrison Ford, Carrie Fisher, Billy Dee Williams, Anthony Daniels, Frank Oz
Music: John Williams
Distinctions: Oscar for Best Sound; special Academy Award for visual effects; Oscar nominations for Best Score and Best Art Direction/Set Decoration; currently #11 on the IMDb's Top 250



My reaction
Synopsis: rebels run away from the evil Space Empire
How I saw it: on video many times (have on DVD), most recently yesterday
Concept: Indifferent.
Story: Good.
Characters: Good.
Dialog: Indifferent.
Pacing: Great.
Cinematography: Good.
Special effects/design: Great.
Acting: Indifferent.  Frank Oz bumps it up a notch.
Music: Good.
Subjective Rating: 9/10 (One of my favorites). Much more fast-paced and exciting than Star Wars, but I like the original better anyway. The cliff-hanger ending is kind of half assed and pointless. I mean, they spent this movie repeatedly escaping from the full forces of the Empire, led by Darth Vader himself, and now we're supposed to worry about whether they can rescue Han from a single bounty hunter? Maybe if Jedi wasn't forced to spend its first half cleaning up Empire's loose ends, it could have had room for a story of its own.
Objective Rating: 3.0/4 (Good) 3.1/4 (Very good)

November 16, 2010

The Dark Knight

The Top 63 Marathon, part 54 (#10!)

(update of a previous post - original is here)



Data
Title: The Dark Knight
Year: 2008
Length: 152 minutes
Director: Christopher Nolan
Writers: Jonathan Nolan & Christopher Nolan; story by Christopher Nolan & David S. Goyer; characters by Bob Kane
Starring: Christian Bale, Heath Ledger, Aaron Eckhart, Michael Caine, Maggie Gyllenhaal, Gary Oldman, Morgan Freeman
Music: James Newton Howard, Hans Zimmer
Distinctions: Oscars for Best Supporting Actor (Ledger) and Best Sound Editing; Oscar nominations for Best Cinematography, Best Art Direction, Best Makeup, Best Editing, Best Sound and Best Visual Effects; currently #10 on the IMDb's Top 250

My reaction
Synopsis: The Joker hatches schemes
How I saw it: in the theater, July 2008; on video a couple times (have on DVD), most recently yesterday
Concept: Great.
Story: Great.
Characters: Great.
Dialog: Good.
Pacing: Great.
Cinematography: Good.
Special effects/design: Great.
Acting: Great. This is a really hard call. I'm underwhelmed by Bale's mouth-breathing, and Eckhart's Bale impression is kind of balls. But everyone else is great. And of course there's Heath Ledger, turning a movie that might have been an 8 or a 9 into a solid 10.
Music: Great.
Subjective Rating: 10/10 (Favorite of my favorites). It's not The Perfect Super Hero movie. It is a contender for Best Super Hero Movie, though.
Objective Rating: 3.8/4 3.9/4 (Great).

November 15, 2010

Star Wars

The Top 63 Marathon, part 53



Data
Title: Star Wars
Year: 1977
Length: 121 minutes [the original version, without random cartoons drawn on top of everything]
Director: George Lucas
Writer: George Lucas
Starring: Mark Hamill, Harrison Ford, Carrie Fisher, Peter Cushing, Alec Guinness, Anthony Daniels
Music: John Williams
Distinctions: Oscars for Best Score, Best Art Direction/Set Decoration, Best Costume Design, Best Editing, Best Visual Effects and Best Sound; special Academy Award for sound effects; Oscar nominations for Best Picture, Best Director, Best Original Screenplay and Best Supporting Actor (Guinness); currently #14 on the IMDb's Top 250



My reaction
Synopsis: a farm boy stumbles across information needed to save the galaxy from a giant death ray
How I saw it: on video many times (have on DVD), most recently yesterday
Concept: Good.
Story: Good.
Characters: Good.
Dialog: Indifferent. Lots of great lines. Lots of terrible lines that have come to seem great since they've been repeated so much.
Pacing: Good.
Cinematography: Good.
Special effects/design: Great.
Acting: Good.
Music: Great.
Subjective Rating: 9/10 (One of my favorites). We've passed the point now on the Top 250 where all I can really say about these movies is, "Dude, it's f***ing [insert title here]." So: Dude, it's f***ing Star Wars.
Objective Rating: 3.2/4 3.3/4 (Very good).

November 14, 2010

A Bit of Fry & Laurie: Season Three

Data
Title: A Bit of Fry & Laurie: Season Three
Year: 1992
Network: BBC
Episodes: 6, at about a half hour each
Creators: Stephen Fry & Hugh Laurie
Director: Kevin Bishop
Writers: Stephen Fry & Hugh Laurie
Starring: Stephen Fry, Hugh Laurie

My reaction
Synopsis: sketch comedy
How I saw it: online (streaming from Netflix), over the past few days
Concept: Good.
Story: n/a
Characters: Indifferent.
Dialog: Great.
Pacing: Good.
Cinematography: Indifferent.
Special effects/design: Good.
Acting: Good.
Music: Good.
Subjective Rating: 7/10 (Good). Better on average than season two, but still doesn't compare to season one.
Objective Rating: 2.9/4 (Good).

November 13, 2010

Casablanca

The Top 63 Marathon, part 52



Data
Title: Casablanca
Year: 1942
Length: 102 minutes
Director: Michael Curtiz
Writers: Julius J. Epstein, Philip G. Epstein & Howard Koch, based on a play by Murray Burnett & Joan Alison
Starring: Humphrey Bogart, Ingrid Bergman, Paul Henreid, Claude Rains
Music: Max Steiner (and non-original music)
Distinctions: Oscars (in 1944) for Best Picture, Best Director and Best Screenplay (adapted); Oscar nominations for Best Actor (Bogart), Best Supporting Actor (Rains), Best Cinematography (black-and-white), Best Score (dramatic or comedy) and Best Editing; currently #16 on the IMDb's Top 250



My reaction
Synopsis: a wealthy, powerful rogue in WWII Morocco refuses to take sides
How I saw it: on video many times, most recently (rented from Netflix) yesterday
Concept: Great.
Story: Great.
Characters: Great.
Dialog: Great.
Pacing: Great.
Cinematography: Great.
Special effects/design: Good.
Acting: Good.
Music: Good.
Subjective Rating: 9/10 (One of my favorites). It's not possible to like movies and not love Casablanca. It just can't be done.
Objective Rating: 3.7/4 (Great).


November 12, 2010

Climax!: Casino Royale

Data
Title: Climax!: episode "Casino Royale"
Year: 1954
Network: CBS
Episode: 1 episode at 50 minutes, from the first season
Director: William H. Brown Jr.
Writers: Charles Bennett & Anthony Ellis, based on the book by Ian Fleming
Starring: Barry Nelson, Peter Lorre, Linda Christian
Music: Jerry Goldsmith

My reaction
Synopsis: special agent Jimmy Bond plays cards to ruin a Soviet agent
How I saw it: online (streaming from Netflix), yesterday
Concept: Good.
Story: Good.
Characters: Indifferent.
Dialog: Good.
Pacing: Great.
Cinematography: Indifferent. Good for live TV, though.
Special effects/design: Indifferent.
Acting: Indifferent. Sadly, Peter Lorre is having an off day. And Barry Nelson (although it's not his fault) as James Bond is some of the worst casting in history. I don't mind that he's American, so much as he's the most un-Bond-like, baby-faced, apple-pie-and-baseball-type guy you could imagine.
Music: Good.
Subjective Rating: 7/10 (Good). They're limited in what they can do, since it's a live broadcast, so action stuff like the car chase (a crucial part of the book) is conspicuously absent. It's very suspenseful, though. And I like how the adaptation keeps some of my favorite bits in the book that weren't in the movie version.
Objective Rating: 2.7/4 (Good)

November 11, 2010

Chitty Chitty Bang Bang

Data
Title: Chitty Chitty Bang Bang
Year: 1968
Length: 144 minutes
Director: Ken Hughes
Writers: Roald Dahl & Ken Hughes, with Richard Maibaum, based on the book by Ian Fleming
Starring: Dick Van Dyke, Sally Ann Howes
Music: Irwin Kostal (score); Robert B. Sherman & Richard M. Sherman (songs)
Distinctions: Oscar nomination for Best Song ("Chitty Chitty Bang Bang")

My reaction
Synopsis: a single father renovates a car, then tells a story about it
How I saw it: on video (have on VHS), yesterday
Concept: Indifferent.
Story: Terrible.
Characters: Indifferent.
Dialog: Indifferent.
Pacing: Terrible.
Cinematography: Indifferent.
Special effects/design: Good.
Acting: Indifferent.
Music: Bad.
Subjective Rating: 2/10 (Terrible). Wow, I am shocked at how bad this is. It's like they just figured kids would watch anything as long as it's brightly colored. Or maybe they thought that singing and "dancing" (there are only two numbers in the whole movie that involve any real dancing - usually they just stand in a series of poses while singing, or look like they're concentrating to remember the lyrics) would be enough to carry two hours of crap.
Objective Rating: 1.4/4 (Bad).

November 10, 2010

The Last Temptation of Christ



Data
Title: The Last Temptation of Christ
Year: 1988
Length: 164 minutes
Director: Martin Scorsese
Writer: Paul Schrader, based on the novel by Nikos Kazantzakis
Starring: Willem Dafoe, Harvey Keitel, Barbara Hershey
Music: Peter Gabriel
Distinctions: Oscar nomination for Best Director

My reaction
Synopsis: Jesus wants God to leave him alone
How I saw it: on video a couple times (have on DVD), most recently yesterday
Concept: Great.
Story: Great. It's only the foundation of most of Western culture - no big deal, whatever.
Characters: Great.
Dialog: Great.
Pacing: Bad.
Cinematography: Indifferent.
Special effects/design: Good.
Acting: Great.
Music: Bad. There's some great music in the soundtrack, but a handful of Very Eighties moments make me wince.
Subjective Rating: 9/10 (One of my favorites). I don't know why I'm so fascinated by this sort of thing. Incidentally, I'm an atheist, and (even though God is unquestionably real in the world of this movie) I see this as having an atheistic perspective. I expect a devout Christian, if they could get past the heaping blasphemy, would see it as just the opposite.
Objective Rating: 3.1/4 3.2/4 (Very good).

November 9, 2010

Doctor Who #154: Silver Nemesis



Data
Title: Doctor Who“Silver Nemesis”
Year: 1988
Network: BBC
Episodes: 3, at 25 minutes each; the third story (of four) from season twenty-five
Creators: Sydney Newman, C.E. Webber, Donald Wilson
Director: Chris Clough
Writer: Kevin Clarke
Starring: Sylvester McCoy, Sophie Aldred
Music: Ron Grainer (theme); Keff McCulloch

My reaction
Synopsis: Cybermen vs. Jacobean time-travelers vs. Nazis, plus a lot of other stuff
How I saw it: on video (rented from Netflix), yesterday
Concept: Bad.
Story: Bad.
Characters: Good.
Dialog: Good.
Pacing: Good.
Cinematography: Indifferent.
Special effects/design: Bad.
Acting: Indifferent.
Music: Bad.
Subjective Rating: 4/10 (Eh). It's like they pulled a dozen random words and phrases out of a hat and called it a plot. It moves quickly, though, and there's some action and humor.
Objective Rating: 1.9/4 (Eh).

November 8, 2010

Alice in Wonderland

Data
Title: Alice in Wonderland
Year: 1951
Length: 75 minutes
Directors: Clyde Geronimi, Wilfred Jackson & Hamilton Luske
Writers: Winston Hibler, Ted Sears, Bill Peet, Erdman Penner, Joe Rinaldi, Milt Banta, William Cottrell, Dick Kelsey, Joe Grant, Dick Huemer, Del Connell, Tom Oreb & John Walbridge, based on books by Lewis Carroll
Starring: Kathryn Beaumont, Ed Wynn, Richard Haydn, Sterling Holloway, Jerry Colonna, Verna Felton, J. Pat O'Malley, Bill Thompson
Music: Oliver Wallace (score); Bob Hilliard, Sammy Fain, Don Raye, Gene de Paul, Mack David, Al Hoffman, Jerry Livingston, Oliver Wallace & Ted Sears (songs)
Distinctions: Oscar nomination for Best Score (musical)

My reaction
Synopsis: a little girl wanders through a nonsense world
How I saw it: on video many times (have on VHS), most recently yesterday
Concept: Great.
Story: Bad.
Characters: Good.
Dialog: Great.
Pacing: Bad.
Cinematography: Indifferent.
Special effects/design: Good.
Acting: Good.
Music: Good.
Subjective Rating: 9/10 (One of my favorites). There's a part of me that thinks every children's movie should be a string of puns and abuses of logic. Okay, maybe not.
Objective Rating: 2.8/4 (Good).

November 7, 2010

Scott Pilgrim vs. the World

Data
Title: Scott Pilgrim vs. the World
Year: 2010
Length: 112 minutes
Director: Edgar Wright
Writers: Michael Bacall & Edgar Wright, based on comic books by Bryan Lee O'Malley
Starring: Michael Cera, Mary Elizabeth Winstead
Music: Nigel Godrich (score); Beck Hansen (songs) (and non-original music)

My reaction
Synopsis: a boy fights for the girl of his dreams
How I saw it: in the theater, yesterday
Concept: Good.
Story: Good.
Characters: Great. It's easy to dismiss them, since the movie turns character development into gags and plays turning-points as parody of dramatic convention. Also, having characters who mask their feelings in a movie where subtlety is bound to be lost is maybe a bit questionable. But I think it works. I've read criticisms where it's complained that Ramona doesn't like Scott enough, but the thing is, we're seeing things from Scott's perspective, and the fact that he has no idea whether she likes him is kind of the point to the whole movie.
Dialog: Great.
Pacing: Great.
Cinematography: Indifferent.
Special effects/design: Great.
Acting: Good.
Music: Great.
Subjective Rating: 8/10 (Great). Wonderful fun. I expected to see something that tried too hard to be novel, but that is not the case. Somehow the surreal video game world manages to seem like a perfectly natural way to express these characters.
Objective Rating: 3.5/4 (Very good).

Hercules: The Legendary Journeys: Season One

Data
Title: Hercules: The Legendary Journeys: Season One
Year: 1995
Network: syndicated
Episodes: 13, at 44 minutes each
Creator: Christian Williams
Directors: Doug Lefler (2 episodes), Peter Ellis (2), Harley Cokeliss (2), Bruce Seth Green (2), John T. Kretchmer (1), George Mendeluk (1), Garth Maxwell (1), Bruce Campbell (1), Jack Perez (1)
Writers: John Schulian (4 episodes), Andrew Dettmann (3), Daniel Truly (3), Robert Bielak (3), Steve Roberts (2), Adam Armus (1), Nora Kay Foster (1)
Starring: Kevin Sorbo
Music: Joseph LoDuca

My reaction
Synopsis: Hercules saves people by fighting monsters and villains
How I saw it: online (streaming from Netflix), over the past month
Concept: Indifferent.
Story: Bad.
Characters: Bad.
Dialog: Terrible.
Pacing: Good.
Cinematography: Bad.
Special effects/design: Bad.
Acting: Bad. Kevin Sorbo: Master of the Exasperated Sigh.
Music: Bad. All I've got to say is, dude really liked Jurassic Park.
Subjective Rating: 6/10 (Okay). Very formulaic, and often painfully bad, but, with the exception of two or three episodes, it's always fun to watch anyway.  And of course it kicks off Xena: Warrior Princess.
Objective Rating: 1.3/4 (Bad).

November 5, 2010

Grand Illusion



Data
Title: La grande illusion
Year: 1937 (France), 1938 (US)
Length: 114 minutes
Director: Jean Renoir
Writers: Charles Spaak & Jean Renoir
Starring: Jean Gabin, Dita Parlo, Pierre Fresnay, Erich von Stroheim, Marcel Dalio
Music: Joseph Kosma
Distinctions: Oscar nomination for Best Picture (1939)



My reaction
Synopsis: French POWs in WWI attempt escape
How I saw it: on video (rented from Netflix), yesterday
Concept: Great.
Story: Great.
Characters: Good.
Dialog: Good.
Pacing: Indifferent.
Cinematography: Indifferent.
Special effects/design: Good.
Acting: Great.
Music: Good.
Subjective Rating: 6/10 (Okay). A nice enough movie. It's a little slow in places but mostly entertaining.  I expect it was a lot more powerful and significant when seen in the context 1930s Europe than it is in 2010s America (although the storytelling is strong enough on a literal level to hold up to time).
Objective Rating: 3.0/4 (Good).

November 4, 2010

The Return of the King

The Top 63 Marathon, part 51 (should have been #53, but Netflix sent it early)



Data
Title: The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King
Year: 2003
Length: 201 minutes (theatrical cut)
Director: Peter Jackson
Writers: Fran Walsh, Philippa Boyens & Peter Jackson, based on the novel by J.R.R. Tolkien
Starring: Sean Astin, Orlando Bloom, Billy Boyd, Bernard Hill, Ian McKellen, Dominic Monaghan, Viggo Mortensen, John Noble, Miranda Otto, John Rhys-Davies, Andy Serkis, David Wenham, Elijah Wood
Music: Howard Shore
Distinctions: Oscars for Best Picture, Best Director, Best Adapted Screenplay, Best Score, Best Song ("Into the West"), Best Art Direction/Set Decoration, Best Costume Design, Best Makeup, Best Editing, Best Visual Effects and Best Sound Mixing; currently #12 on the IMDb's Top 250



My reaction
Synopsis: desperate battles against the forces of evil
How I saw it: in the theater, 2003; on video many times (have extended cut on DVD), most recently yesterday (theatrical cut, rented from Netflix)
Concept: Indifferent.
Story: Good.
Characters: Great.
Dialog: Good. This time they give most of the ridiculously corny lines to John Rhys-Davies. That works.
Pacing: Indifferent. Five endings!
Cinematography: Indifferent.
Special effects/design: Great.
Acting: Good. Liv Tyler and Elijah Wood are both still terrible, but Tyler has a smaller part and Frodo's so near to dead for most of the movie that it doesn't matter much.
Music: Good.
Subjective Rating: 9/10 (One of my favorites). I liked it last night a lot more than I did the last time I saw it, a few years ago. It always used to be my least favorite of the trilogy, but now I found myself watching it as a film rather than as a geekfest. I can't even do that with the other two. This one just works differently. It shamelessly manipulates your emotions, where the first two rely more on a "Dude, that's awesome" factor. Although, some of the Attempted Emotion Manipulation doesn't work at all (e.g., the romantic subplot, or anything after the first ending), so it's good they still have enough awesomeness to fall back on.
Objective Rating: 3.0/4 (Good) 3.1/4 (Very good).

November 3, 2010

MASH



Data
Title: MASH
Year: 1970
Length: 116 minutes
Director: Robert Altman
Writer: Ring Lardner Jr., based on the novel by Richard Hooker
Starring: Donald Sutherland, Elliott Gould, Tom Skerritt, Sally Kellerman, Robert Duvall, Roger Bowen
Music: Johnny Mandel (and non-original music)
Distinctions: Oscar for Best Adapted Screenplay; Oscar nominations for Best Picture, Best Director, Best Supporting Actress (Kellerman) and Best Editing

My reaction
Synopsis: hijinks in an army hospital
How I saw it: on video, yesterday (rented from Netflix)
Concept: Good.
Story: Indifferent. There isn't a story.
Characters: Great.
Dialog: Great.
Pacing: Good.
Cinematography: Indifferent.
Special effects/design: Great.
Acting: Good.
Music: Good. The one thing that makes this movie significantly better than the TV series: Japanese Rockabilly.
Subjective Rating: 7/10 (Good). It's exactly like watching four or five episodes of the TV show back-to-back. Which is fine, but I guess I was expecting a lot more.
Objective Rating: 3.1/4 (Very good).

November 1, 2010

Bad Horror VSM wrap-up

I've learned a few things from the Bad Horror Very Slow Marathon.

#1: Don't put a time limit on movie marathons. (They're called "Very Slow Marathons" for a reason. Real marathons always seem like a good idea, and never are.)

#2: Don't commit yourself to watching movies that you have no reason to think will be worth watching. (In future marathons, all questionable titles will be strictly optional, subject to the "wait, why am I watching this sh**?" clause.)

#3, and this one is important: Don't ever buy a DVD made by "TGG Direct." (They're not cheap just because the contents are in the public domain. Many of the movies in the set are copied from old VHS tapes. The soundtrack of at least half of them is out of sync. And all of them are at a video quality that makes youtube look good. Presumably the reason for this last point is to save the few cents that more discs would cost, the bastards.)

And as long as I'm making this wrap-up post, I might as well rank the movies (ordered by "subjective score," with ties broken by "objective score"):

Tier 1: worth watching
1. Night of the Living Dead, 1968 (8/10, 2.9/4)
2. House on Haunted Hill, 1959 (7/10, 2.7/4)
3. The Last Man on Earth, 1964 (7/10, 2.3/4)
4. Count Dracula and His Vampire Bride, 1974 (6/10, 2.3/4)

Tier 2: kind of unpleasant but at least they're good for a laugh
5. I Bury the Living, 1958 (4/10, 1.5/4)
6. Bloody Pit of Horror, 1965 (4/10, 1.0/4)
7. Dementia 13, 1963 (3/10, 1.5/4)
8. Blood Tide, 1982 (3/10, 1.3/4)
9. Nightmare Castle, 1965 (3/10, 1.3/4)
10. The Undertaker and His Pals, 1966 (3/10, 0.9/4)

Tier 3: People might pay good money to leave a theater showing this crap
11. Fangs of the Living Dead, 1969 (2/10, 0.8/4)
12. Carnival of Souls, 1962 (2/10, 0.8/4)
13. Dominique Is Dead, 1978 (2/10, 0.7/4)
14. The Ghost, 1963 (2/10, 0.6/4)

Teir 4: I just lost all respect for Christopher Plummer, as an actor and as a human being
15. The Pyx, 1973 (1/10, 0.3/4) - THE worst movie I have ever seen (or ever expect to see)

We now return you to your regularly scheduled Top 63 Marathon, already in progress.

Bloodtide

part 15 of the Bad Horror Marathon



Data
Title: Blood Tide
Year: 1982
Length: 82 minutes
Director: Richard Jefferies
Writers: Richard Jefferies & Nico Mastorakis
Starring: James Earl Jones, José Ferrer, Mary Louise Weller, Martin Kove, Lydia Cornell, Deborah Shelton
Music: Jerry Mosely

My reaction
Synopsis: a diver awakens something evil
How I saw it: on video, yesterday (have on DVD)
Concept: Indifferent.
Story: Bad.
Characters: Indifferent.
Dialog: Indifferent.
Pacing: Bad.
Cinematography: Bad.
Special effects/design: Bad.
Acting: Bad. Most are okay, but the lead (Martin Kove) is terrible.
Music: Bad.
Subjective Rating: 3/10 (Bad). It's a stupid movie, but at least James Earl Jones is awesome as a Shakespeare-quoting rogue.  And there's a monster, so that's something.
Objective Rating: 1.3/4 (Bad).